robotoil wrote:just signed prints are numerous too across editions. how about a blurb somewhere that says; edition can be signed, dated, numbered, ap, or ot signed.
I wouldn't go that far. There's already a small bootlegging problem with a select few prints. No need in helping to crack open the floodgates a little wider.
i agree that not numbered variants(or goofs) of many prints exist, however it appears that a particularly large number of Malcolm Reds have turned up like this...
The last time I can remember seeing a print turn up farely frequently like this was MLK a couple of years ago...
It's a mistake that has happened before. This tends to happen when they stray from the usual run of 300 as the people who number them are used to numbering out of 300.
The run size is definitely 200, your print is just numbered incorrectly.
i've heard on here about quite a few numbering issues so i guess that's believeable. will be easy to explain and hard to believe to the seller once i re-sell this piece as i'm thinking of doing.
I have 2 prints i bought from obeygiant and the came # and unsigned. I have even seen one were it was signed on the top of the print upside down and on the left but the #ing was still in the bottom left !
How will we ever know how to get up, If we don't know how to get down!